Debcheck


	Back to QA Debcheck - forky Summary All packages (light) main only Broken PreDepends Broken Depends Broken Recommends Broken Suggests HalfBroken PreDepends HalfBroken Depends HalfBroken Recommends HalfBroken Suggests Build-Depends HalfBroken Build-Depends Malformed Build-Depends OldLibs Priority Old Standards-Version No Standards-Version Wrong Standards-Version Syntax other Depends Main on !Main all sections Broken PreDepends Broken Depends Broken Recommends Broken Suggests HalfBroken PreDepends HalfBroken Depends HalfBroken Recommends HalfBroken Suggests Build-Depends HalfBroken Build-Depends Malformed Build-Depends OldLibs Priority Old Standards-Version No Standards-Version Wrong Standards-Version Syntax

Distribution: forky

Problems for source package latexmk

Current Source Version: 1:4.87~ds-1
Current Maintainer: Debian TeX Task Force <debian-tex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Section: main
BTS entry: https://bugs.debian.org/src:latexmk

Binary Package: latexmk (Version: 1:4.87~ds-1)

BTS entry: https://bugs.debian.org/latexmk

Half Broken Relationships

(not necessarily bugs)

Package has a Recommends on gv which cannot be satisfied on riscv64. At least one of gv | postscript-viewer can be satisfied however.
Package has a Recommends on gv which cannot be satisfied on arm64. At least one of gv | postscript-viewer can be satisfied however.
Package has a Recommends on gv which cannot be satisfied on ppc64el. At least one of gv | postscript-viewer can be satisfied however.
Package has a Recommends on gv which cannot be satisfied on s390x. At least one of gv | postscript-viewer can be satisfied however.
Package has a Recommends on gv which cannot be satisfied on armhf. At least one of gv | postscript-viewer can be satisfied however.
Package has a Recommends on gv which cannot be satisfied on amd64. At least one of gv | postscript-viewer can be satisfied however.
Package has a Recommends on gv which cannot be satisfied on i386. At least one of gv | postscript-viewer can be satisfied however.

Last updated: Thu Oct 9 15:25:43 2025

DO NOT MASS FILE BUG REPORTS
GET A CONSENSUS ON debian-devel@lists.debian.org BEFORE MASS FILING BUGS