Debcheck


	Back to QA Debcheck - sid Summary All packages (light) main only Broken PreDepends Broken Depends Broken Recommends Broken Suggests HalfBroken PreDepends HalfBroken Depends HalfBroken Recommends HalfBroken Suggests Build-Depends HalfBroken Build-Depends Malformed Build-Depends OldLibs Priority Old Standards-Version No Standards-Version Wrong Standards-Version Syntax other Depends Main on !Main all sections Broken PreDepends Broken Depends Broken Recommends Broken Suggests HalfBroken PreDepends HalfBroken Depends HalfBroken Recommends HalfBroken Suggests Build-Depends HalfBroken Build-Depends Malformed Build-Depends OldLibs Priority Old Standards-Version No Standards-Version Wrong Standards-Version Syntax

Distribution: sid

Problems for source package binutils

Current Source Version: 2.45.50.20251201-1
Current Maintainer: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
Section: main
BTS entry: https://bugs.debian.org/src:binutils

Binary Package: binutils-s390x-linux-gnu (Version: 2.45.50.20251201-1)

BTS entry: https://bugs.debian.org/binutils-s390x-linux-gnu

Relationships

Package has a Suggests on binutils-doc (= 2.45.50.20251201-1) which cannot be satisfied on s390x.

Binary Package: binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu (Version: 2.45.50.20251201-1)

BTS entry: https://bugs.debian.org/binutils-x86-64-linux-gnu

Relationships

Package has a Suggests on binutils-doc (= 2.45.50.20251201-1) which cannot be satisfied on s390x.

Binary Package: binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu (Version: 2.45.50.20251201-1)

BTS entry: https://bugs.debian.org/binutils-aarch64-linux-gnu

Relationships

Package has a Suggests on binutils-doc (= 2.45.50.20251201-1) which cannot be satisfied on s390x.

Binary Package: binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf (Version: 2.45.50.20251201-1)

BTS entry: https://bugs.debian.org/binutils-arm-linux-gnueabihf

Relationships

Package has a Suggests on binutils-doc (= 2.45.50.20251201-1) which cannot be satisfied on armhf.
Package has a Suggests on binutils-doc (= 2.45.50.20251201-1) which cannot be satisfied on s390x.

Binary Package: binutils-i686-linux-gnu (Version: 2.45.50.20251201-1)

BTS entry: https://bugs.debian.org/binutils-i686-linux-gnu

Relationships

Package has a Suggests on binutils-doc (= 2.45.50.20251201-1) which cannot be satisfied on s390x.

Binary Package: binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu (Version: 2.45.50.20251201-1)

BTS entry: https://bugs.debian.org/binutils-powerpc-linux-gnu

Relationships

Package has a Suggests on binutils-doc (= 2.45.50.20251201-1) which cannot be satisfied on s390x.

Binary Package: binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu (Version: 2.45.50.20251201-1)

BTS entry: https://bugs.debian.org/binutils-powerpc64-linux-gnu

Relationships

Package has a Suggests on binutils-doc (= 2.45.50.20251201-1) which cannot be satisfied on s390x.

Binary Package: binutils (Version: 2.45.50.20251201-1)

BTS entry: https://bugs.debian.org/binutils

Relationships

Package has a Suggests on binutils-doc (>= 2.45.50.20251201-1) which cannot be satisfied on armhf.
Package has a Suggests on binutils-doc (>= 2.45.50.20251201-1) which cannot be satisfied on s390x.

Binary Package: binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu (Version: 2.45.50.20251201-1)

BTS entry: https://bugs.debian.org/binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu

Relationships

Package has a Suggests on binutils-doc (= 2.45.50.20251201-1) which cannot be satisfied on s390x.

Binary Package: binutils-powerpc64le-linux-gnu (Version: 2.45.50.20251201-1)

BTS entry: https://bugs.debian.org/binutils-powerpc64le-linux-gnu

Relationships

Package has a Suggests on binutils-doc (= 2.45.50.20251201-1) which cannot be satisfied on s390x.

Last updated: Mon Dec 1 15:25:03 2025

DO NOT MASS FILE BUG REPORTS
GET A CONSENSUS ON debian-devel@lists.debian.org BEFORE MASS FILING BUGS