Debcheck


	Back to QA Debcheck - sid Summary All packages (light) main only Broken PreDepends Broken Depends Broken Recommends Broken Suggests HalfBroken PreDepends HalfBroken Depends HalfBroken Recommends HalfBroken Suggests Build-Depends HalfBroken Build-Depends Malformed Build-Depends OldLibs Priority Old Standards-Version No Standards-Version Wrong Standards-Version Syntax other Depends Main on !Main all sections Broken PreDepends Broken Depends Broken Recommends Broken Suggests HalfBroken PreDepends HalfBroken Depends HalfBroken Recommends HalfBroken Suggests Build-Depends HalfBroken Build-Depends Malformed Build-Depends OldLibs Priority Old Standards-Version No Standards-Version Wrong Standards-Version Syntax

Distribution: sid forky trixie bookworm bullseye

Problems for source package sasm

Current Source Version: 3.15.0+ds-1
Current Maintainer: Judit Foglszinger <urbec@debian.org>
Section: main
BTS entry: https://bugs.debian.org/src:sasm

Binary Package: sasm (Version: 3.15.0+ds-1)

BTS entry: https://bugs.debian.org/sasm

Half Broken Relationships

(not necessarily bugs)

Package has a Depends on fasm which cannot be satisfied on riscv64. At least one of nasm | fasm | binutils can be satisfied however.
Package has a Depends on fasm which cannot be satisfied on mips64el. At least one of nasm | fasm | binutils can be satisfied however.
Package has a Depends on fasm which cannot be satisfied on arm64. At least one of nasm | fasm | binutils can be satisfied however.
Package has a Depends on fasm which cannot be satisfied on armhf. At least one of nasm | fasm | binutils can be satisfied however.
Package has a Depends on fasm which cannot be satisfied on s390x. At least one of nasm | fasm | binutils can be satisfied however.
Package has a Depends on fasm which cannot be satisfied on ppc64el. At least one of nasm | fasm | binutils can be satisfied however.
Package has a Depends on fasm which cannot be satisfied on armel. At least one of nasm | fasm | binutils can be satisfied however.

Last updated: Thu Oct 30 15:25:04 2025

DO NOT MASS FILE BUG REPORTS
GET A CONSENSUS ON debian-devel@lists.debian.org BEFORE MASS FILING BUGS