Testing Excuses for cccl -- Debian Quality Assurance

Testing: Excuse for cccl

Migration status for cccl (- to 2.2.0-2): BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression
Issues preventing migration:

autopkgtest for cccl/2.2.0-2: amd64: Regression or new test ♻, arm64: No tests, superficial or marked flaky ♻, armel: Regression or new test ♻, armhf: Regression or new test ♻, i386: Regression or new test ♻, ppc64el: No tests, superficial or marked flaky ♻, riscv64: No tests, superficial or marked flaky ♻, s390x: Regression or new test ♻
autopkgtest for cub/n/a: amd64: Failed (not a regression), arm64: Failed (not a regression), armel: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), armhf: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), i386: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), ppc64el: Failed (not a regression), riscv64: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), s390x: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻)
Too young, only 1 of 5 days old

Additional info:

Piuparts tested OK - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/c/cccl.html
Reproducible on amd64 - info ♻
Reproducible on arm64 - info ♻
Waiting for reproducibility test results on armhf - info ♻

Excuses generated on: Sat Feb 22 05:04:49 2025 UTC

Maintainer page Package tracker

Testing migration hints, key packages, autoremovals (YAML), excuses (YAML), log, cruft, documentation.

Experimental manual migration pseudo-excuses (YAML).